Theatre Review: A TIME TO KILL

In appearance, A Time to Kill seems to reinforce the White savior concept. Despite that element in the narrative, it’s a realistic picture of the prevalent racial power dynamics in the justice system. The time and place of the story help us understand why a White lawyer is necessary to save a Black man’s fate.

1984, Clanton, Mississippi. Tonya Hailey, a ten-year-old Black girl, is savagely raped, tortured, and beaten by Pete Willard (Troy Whitaker) and Billy Ray Cobb (Adam Mattson), two White neo-Confederates driving around town in a pickup truck. The two men are arrested, and after their bond hearing, they’re both gunned down by Carl Lee Hailey (Sherrick O’Quinn), Tonya’s father. With limited economic resources, Carl asks Jake Brigance (Hudson Long), a young White attorney, to represent him in his murder case. After a deep discount, Jake takes the case.

Helping Jake on this legal challenge are Lucien Wilbanks (Michael C. Mahon), a disbarred drunk lawyer, and Ellen Roark (Anica Petrovic), a smart law student who develops a romantic interest in a faithfully married Jake. Lucien suggests using insanity as the basis for his defense. The prosecutor is Rufus Buckley (Mark Stancato), an ambitious District Attorney who hopes to further his political career by winning this case. Presiding this case is Judge Omar Noose (Neil Thompson). As the Ku Klux Klan closes in on Jake to intimidate him and the more resourceful NAACP tries to take over the defense, the loyalty and trust between Carl and Jake is challenged. With his freedom and life on the line, Carl now has to decide whether to stick with Jake or allow the NAACP to represent him.

Despite some inaccuracies of the legal procedures depicted, John Grisham gives A Time to Kill all the necessary ingredients to make it a compelling story. Tom Lazarus executes the play in a riveting depiction of reversals and fights against time. The stage adaptation by Rupert Holmes doesn’t include some of the characters and events mentioned in the book, but the play keeps the hectic and exciting pace of Grisham’s writing. The success of the play, of course, relies on the interpretation of the director. Lazarus keeps the emotions flowing with the twists and turns of a plot which centers around the mutual trust developed between the main characters. With dynamic blocking and solid performances, Lazarus gives this play that sense of urgency and empathy that keeps the audience rooting for the characters. Stancato shines as the aggressive DA. He adds relentless ambition and even charm to his character, a unique duality to his interpretation. O’Quinn depicts the desperation and criticality of a man whose fate hangs by a thread in incredible circumstances. He’s another USC graduate making the rounds in the local theatre scene. As for Long, he carries the story with the conviction of a lawyer facing physical danger and professional risk. He goes to that place where his character experiences vulnerability and the mythic transformation that will determine his utter failure or pivotal success. As a supporting role, Holmes delivers a remarkable performance, expressing the pain and susceptibility of a broken mother and wife in a precarious situation. Her presence and fine acting skills add a magnetic touch to this production. Overall, the cast and the direction energize the play, making it relevant and exciting to watch. It’s a story of survival. It’s a story of power dynamics. And it’s also a story of change.

As a trained attorney and writer, Grisham knows how to play with motivations and emotions, bending the actual legal procedures at times to advance a story, but always with the aim to entertain a wide audience. A defense strategy looking for a non-guilty decision based on insanity would send the defendant to a mental institution, most likely for life. Regardless, Grisham is one of most prolific and successful writers, having sold over 300 million copies of his books. His experience gives him a unique perspective about the legal and not so legal activities that happen in the courtrooms. Raised in Mississippi, he has also seen first hand the complex realities of racial tension and the outcomes of a biased justice system, but also the possibilities and opportunities of a change. In this respect, Lazarus’ production pictures those nuances in an eloquent and entertaining manner. Long nails the compelling closing argument, inviting the jury to challenge their perception on humanity and race, as if invoking a wind of change.

This is a special opportunity for the audience to experience Grisham with excellent casting and direction. It’s a vivid representation of what goes down in the South from the perspective of an insider. Celebrating their 53rd anniversary, The Group Rep and Producer Stevie Stern honor a celebrated author with an appealing production that explores the depths of human brutality and the extraordinary efforts to uphold the law above all.

A Time to Kill

The Group Rep Theatre – Main Stage (First Floor)
10900 Burbank Blvd.
North Hollywood 91601

May 22 – June 28, 2026
Fridays and Saturdays at 8:00pm; Sundays at 2:00pm

Ticketsthegrouprep.com

Adapted for the stage by award-winning playwright Rupert Holmes. Directed by Tom Lazarus. Produced for the Group Rep by Stevie Stern.

Cast: Patrick AnthonyReed Michael CampbellDominic Ryan GabrielJennifer C. HolmesHudson LongMichael C. MahonAdam MattsonRosney MaugerSherrick O’QuinnAnica Petrovic, James Lawrence PowellSteve RozicMark Stancato, Neil ThompsonSandra TuckerTroy Whitaker, and Steve Young.

Creative team: Tom Lazarus (Set Design), Noemi Barrera (Lighting Design), Shon LeBlanc (Costume Design), Avi Kipper (Sound Design), Alex Salkin (Property Master), Doug Haverty (Graphic Design), Lee Redmond (Set Build Foreman).

Theatre Review: Twelve Angry Jurors

The Group Rep presents Twelve Angry Jurors. Adapted by Sherman L. Sergel based on the Emmy-winning television movie by Reginald Rose. Directed by Tom Lazarus. Produced for The Group Rep by Stevie Stern.

Playwright Sherman L. Sergel takes us to a jury room in a hot summer late afternoon. The year is 1958 and a teenager has been accused of murdering his father. It’s now up to the jurors to return a guilty or not guilty verdict.

In this intriguing drama, the race of the kid is not revealed. Since the teleplay first aired in the 50s, people have speculated that the teenager was Black or Puerto Rican. In Tom Lazarus‘ staging, all we learn is that the kid was living in the slums. The fascinating aspect of the play is how the attitudes of the jurors reflect the diversity of society. Some of the jurors come from privileged backgrounds while others come from disadvantaged communities.

In the original teleplay and later in the movie, the 12 jurors, were all White males. For The Group Rep‘s production, director Lazarus and producer Stevie Stern decided to make the race and gender of the jurors more diverse. Whether that is a reflection of the status quo or not of the American justice system, it’s up for debate. It is perhaps, Lazarus and Stern’s way to protest the systematic discrimination in the history of the selection and conducting of the jury duty process.

The two witnesses in the play, the man and the woman that provide testimony against the kid, become characters on their own right. Their testimony is either upheld or disputed during the jurors’ deliberation. The apparent initial agreement on a guilty verdict is questioned by Juror # 8 (Neil Thompson). His refusal to accept the majority’s decision leads to a closer look at the witnesses’ account of the events surrounding the murder. On the other hand, Juror # 3 (Mark Stancato) becomes the bully, the bigot. Two opposites that more than just characters, are the reflection of people’s attitudes towards the most underprivileged members of society.   

In addition to the excellent dialogue, the diverse cast—which includes women, African Americans, and immigrants—are a mirror of American society. The heat depicted in the play becomes a pressure cooker, an uncomfortable environment to test the patience and the concentration needed to decide whether a person deserves the death penalty or not.

Thompson and Stancato offer compelling performances as the dichotomy of society. Thompson as Juror # 8 delivers a credible representation of the ideals of justice and democracy embodied in the American Dream and the Constitution. As for Stancato, he excels as the representation of the oppressive system and disengaged observer of social marginalization. The blocking allows for a dynamic performance of the 12 jurors, which move around the table to show their expressions and state of minds. 

Race and gender give this production a progressive take on the always gripping theme of jury deliberation, an environment where bigotry and prejudice can jeopardize the fairness of the justice system.

Twelve Angry Jurors

The Group Rep
10900 Burbank Blvd
N. Hollywood, CA 91601

January 26 — March 3, 2024.

Fridays and Saturdays at 8pm, Sundays at 2pm.

Ticketsthegrouprep.com

Adapted by Sherman L. Sergel, based on the Emmy-winning television movie
by Reginald Rose, directed by Tom Lazarus and produced for The Group Rep by Stevie Stern. Cast: Linda Alznauer (Juror 4), Jane Bonem (Guard), Paul Cady (Juror 2), Belinda Howell (Juror 10), Stephanie Keefer (Juror 11), Stan Mazin (Juror 9), Bob McCollum (Judge), Richard Reich (Juror 7), Mark Stancato (Juror 3), Melissa Strauss (Juror 1), Neil Thompson (Juror 8), Cathy Diane Tomlin (Juror 6), Mouchette van Helsdingen (Juror 12), Tamir Yardenne (Juror 5) and Tilly Ye (Juror 6 – Feb. 16 – 18). Creative team: Tom Lazarus (Set Design), Chris Winfield (Set Construction), Frank McKown (Lighting Design), Shon LeBlanc (Costume Design), Steve Shaw (Sound Design), and Kristin Stancato (Stage Manager).